The Penalty for Good Looks in Western Australia

Reasoned Response to the Article: $120,000 - The Penalty for Good Looks in the Adelaide Advertiser. The westbound Australian Full Courts decision to award a lessen compensation to Widow, Mrs Teresa de sales, because of good looks is completely legal. But is it recompense? This practice of fairness was passed in 1863, when women did not eat overmuch in the counselling of an independent income, when they were dependent on their husbands for sustenance and shelter. This law of nature utter that as beautiful widows had a high likelihood of acquiring remarried and thereby substantiate a to a greater extent stable monetary status than plain women, they did not assume a full(a) compensation. Back then this was a useful law - load-bearing(a) those women who were not as likely to re marry - further now, creation more independent than in the past, they can channel whether to marry or not. A beautiful adult female whitethorn not want to get married again, but because of this law, they would pass on to conk with less compensation than a plain woman who may or may not want to get remarried. This law, which traveled into the Australian legal system from Eng add, has been repealed from the English well-grounded dodging since 1971. Australia should repeal the law too.

In a land where everyone is verbalize to be equal, there should not be a law discriminating between one womans face and anothers. Mrs de Sales verbalize ...It shouldnt matter if I had four arms and empurple muscae volitantes; a someone should still get 100 per centime of their payout. What Mrs de Sales meant wa s that every women, plain and beautiful, are! equal and they should all, therefore, be compensated the same. To more accurately state her point, Mrs de Sales should have said: ...It shouldnt matter if I was the most beautiful somebody in... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper