Activity Based Costing Essay -- essays research papers

IntroductionActivity Based Costing ( first rudiment) addresses internal operating concerns and is an augmentation to the traditionalistic cost management musical arrangement. It is not a replacement for traditional accounting, precisely makes use of the source documents provided from standard job cost systems. alphabet looks at a business units events as cost drivers and assigns both company resources and accumulated costs against those events in a time-phased sequence. Revenue tracking provides management with a different point of view on the lucrativeness of products and services, providing insight into pricing. Middle management and technical performing organizations are tortuous in the line item reporting provided within the first principle system, enable management to achieve more(prenominal) responsibility of reported information wind up-to-end all levels of the organization. ABC is being ostensible by the accounting effort as the wave of the future and is gaining broad acceptance within bigger organizations. This system is intended to provide performing entities and management alike. History of ABCActivity Based Costing (ABC) is an approach to costing that considers the resources consumed by activities in order to create and deliver a product or service. It evolved in the mid-1980s to improve the allocation of manufacturing overhead costs to products, but it soon became unembellished that activity-based costing systems could be expanded to include non-manufacturing costs (Langfield-Smith, Thorne & Hilton, 2004).Review of ABCWhereas the underlying assumption of a conventional costing system is but that products cause costs, an activity based costing system assumes that cost objects (e.g. juice) creates the shoot for activities (e.g. manufacturing), which in turn causes resources to be consumed (e.g. manufacturing time, outlet space, etc.) and causes costs. Cost objects are the solid ground for performing activities, and activities are the processes or procedures that cause work and create costs. ABC analyses costs from the perception of the how much a particular activity costs, and the derive of resources consumed by the end product of the activity. Using activity based costing differs from traditional cost accounting in that the focus is on the activities that are required to produce an end product, rather than assuming that the volume of the end product is the only driver of costs. A cost driver is ... ... trading operationsProblems with ABCWhile activity-based costing may yield more expand product cost estimates, it must pass a cost utility test before being passed. Activity-based costing requires a much more detailed breakdown of costs into activities that cause costs. This can be a complex task involving the teamwork of management, production, accounting, purchasing, marketing and many others. A company should implement ABC only if it thinks the benefit from improved management decisions will outgo the cost of establishing and maintaining the new cost system. Furthermore, there might be underrating of the task of collecting activity driver data, and the implementation of this system may be considered a financial management which might cause lean commitment from operational managers.We should use activity-based costing if we find the benefits from the new system exceed its costs.REFERENCE1.Innes, J & Mitchell, F. (1991), Activity Based Cost instruction?, CIMA2.Smith, K.L., Thorne, H., Hilton, R.W., (2004), Management Accounting an Australian perspective?, 3rd edition, McGraw Hill