Comparative Analysis of Two Essays

Comparative Analysis of Two Essays on Truth and the Media two Who Killed Privacy? and The Shock of the True deal with the subject of truth and the media, each has a different focus. In Roger Resent custodyts Who Killed Privacy the issue is whether the fact that something is neat Justifies it as a subject for banter in the media, and to what extent the humanity interest in the subject is appropriate. The Shock of the True is an exploration of offensive and violence as a subject of works of non-fiction.Both authors imply that a great deal is printed or shown in the media for he express occasion of satisfying the publics lust for the lurid or the scandalous. Individual privacy enters into the discussion in the first of the essays, with the author concluding that the truth of a instruction often bears no relevance and that details of the private lives of public figures be exploited for the titillation and curiosity of the public.Reference is made to the details of improper take over made about George Bush and Bill Clinton and the sexual scandal of presidential candidate Gary Hart It seemed clear to most voters that the ability of both men to govern was not Impaired y their scandals. Yet Gary Harts boat expel seemed to indicate a person out of control, so a greenback was drawn. The author cites well-known Instances of the intense focus on private, but true, facts that progress to an abusive use of the freedom to disseminate information. He mentions TRW and other honorable mention agencies for making private information available without regard to Its accuracy, and chastised programs like market Households for publishing software containing personal, financial and consumer habits of Individuals. He states that, despite legal efforts to the contrary,