The Social Sciences

Assignment-4 how the kinds between people and plow atomic number 18 companyed. In this appellation I bequeath try to comp are and contrast two views of how the relationship between people and barter is ordered. The relationship between people and handicraft is then examined in chapter 7 of making affectionate lives. I leave alone be comparing and contrasting the differences and similarities between thoroughfare barter addresss Colin Buchanan and Hans Monderman. Colin Buchanan was commission by the UK government in 1961 to start work on the trace Traffic in t avows for the Ministry of transport chapter 7 p. 27 the report was aimed to produce a new design for urban outer quadriceps femoris in order to engineer the efficient distri nonwithstandingion and access of a large numbers of vehicles to a large number of buildings. Achieving a satisf human actionory standard in our surroundings for life in townspeoples. Chapter 7 P. 327 Buchanan had fantasys of to a greater e xtent towns to be organised to the liquefy of trade and more tracks to be build. The Department of Transport reports between the Second World War and 1969 the Numbers of cars on the roads quadrupled this meant that not only needed more roads needed to be reinforced but withal a new way for towns to live with cars. Chapter 7 p. 326 Silva 2009 Cited Ministry of transport 1963. The future of choking road congestion was feared unless the speedy rise in demand for car travel was matched by an incr locomote supply of roads. Buchanans concept was built on the explicit principle of segregation, tuition from chapter 7 Ordering social life the case of road transaction making social lives sometimes the strict separation of vehicles and people cars were afforded their own generously proportioned network and pedestrians were safely tucked away in residential blocks often terminating enquired cul-de-sacs. Silva, Cited Buchanan 2009 p. 329 chapter 7 the whole subject of traffic in towns Is capable of being localize on a rational and quantitative basis. Guesswork and perception can be largely eliminated given the necessary information, many aspects or precisely culpable and there is scope for techniques which testament greatly ease the burden of decision between alternative courses of action. Now lets examine an other(a) road traffic engineer and compare this to the Buchannan report. Hans Monderman a road traffic engineer from theNetherlands had different ideas on how to organise traffic and people. Mondermans theory was the removal of every traffic obstacles road signs traffic lights and drop the spaces left field-hand(a) for humans to share the space with motorists. In evidence in 1989 the councillors of Drachten voted to re run away every single traffic light and abolish road signs and warning signs. P. 334 Silva 2009 chapter 7 his concept was that when all traffic obstacles were removed, the space left was to be shared by drivers and pedestrians.His theory w as to narrow the roads and besides put features alongside them. He planted trees and flowers and also Fountains, this was to discourage drivers from hotfoot the psychology of it was that they would slow down while driving past these features. Drachten is the town of 43,000 people in the Netherlands Monderman shared space approach was known as the Drachten experiment. Silva2009, cited councillor Koop kerkestra p. 334. The head of traffic policy at the town anteroom of Drachten, the lights were causing problems people were for ever waiting to get across junctions.We also had more than 140 casualties a year. It was difficult to know what to do, and we sure enough didnt take to ban cars as we loved cars here in Drachten. Fortunately I met traffic engineer who had an unconventional solution. P. 334 chapter 7 Silva, 2009 cited Monderman. If you treat drivers like zombies they will be take aim like zombies explains Monderman in other words, motorists or taught to blindly delineate in structions, they stop opinion for themselves, and accidents follow.The above are a few briefs on traffic engineers Hans Monderman and Colin Buchannan who were both tasked with very difficult assignments and both had on the whole different views on how to manage the traffic flow, although Buchannan was much earlier than Monderman in years, both had quite revolutionary ideas of their times. Trying to compere the similarities between Monderman and Buchanan is not an easy task to undertake, send-offly they were both road traffic engineers which are important I guess, and they were both commissioned by governments until now though Mondermans commission was through local government.They were both commissioned to create the expenditure of better space and a way to ease the flow of traffic in towns. They both looked at traffic and humans and how distributively play a role in creating a design for traffic to move more easily. This was also due to the similarity in statistics of ever c hange magnitude car owners on the roads, and I suppose a reason to anticipate accidents in the future. What are the differences in both these engineers ideas plans and concepts of how to manage road traffic between humans and cars? Firstly Buchanan segregated humans from road traffic and built towns on the edges of motorways.Towns were built such as Milton Keynes and many other places with never ending cul de sacs and housing estates which were hard to get to even using the sign posts as it all looked the same. This isolated the towns from the spacious road networks, resulting in later years ever more traffic lights calm down zones and such like. However Monderman wanted to share this space left butt after the removal of traffic lights and all road signs with pedestrians cyclists and car drivers. Arguments. Buchanan based is road hierarchy on segregating people in towns from traffic?Did this mean primary roads and avenue roads were situated before motorways? Which streets and r oads were best placed to distribute the traffic flow, do Buchanans plans still work in to sidereal days new-fashioned society, and it playms ever more increasing traffic We need ever more modern day thinking and new approaches. Buchanan based his road flows from towns thus the delectation of the space with segregation from people means many town roads and street roads were cut off from the motorways. Was there enough space left for what we regard today in the likes of bus lanes, cycle lanes, did Buchanan foresee this.If he did surely the roads he planned and then subsequently built would be a lot wider. Today we are left with check amount of space If you drive down a normal amply Street in any town today you will see that traffic is very crowded and congested, there will be a limited amount of space for cars and vans taxis etc. You will notice that the interior lanes are used specifically for public transport busses. I would certainly argue that the Buchanan report had many f laws using anecdotal evidence put before me. I say anecdotal as I take for no evidence to look at as I have to use what is in front of me for this assignment.Now let me turn to Hans Monderman and his vision of the shared space approach. This is very interesting as he relies but on interaction of the person or persons driving vehicles, with pedestrians or cyclists. Since all the obstacles of traffic lights and even road kerbs have been removed, this leads all participants having to acknowledge each other and prejudge one anothers next movement. This idea seems like what you see on the TV, in places such as India Pakistan and Asia, which all traffic is locomote fast around town centre junctions, which seems quite chaotic to ones first instinct.They all in fact seem in a marvellous hurry and one has no data to rely on? approximately how many accidents or crashes they may be in places like this. I dont quite know if this is the same as Hanss Mondermans shared space theory, but that s all Ive got to go on in my argument. What was it Monderman said concerning the use of traffic lights in town centres, with drivers having to obey the instructions given by a set of lights, if you treat people like zombies they will act like zombies Silva2009, cited Monderman p. 34 in that this idea is similar to the behavioural social scientist Foucault. Who when analyse people and their behaviours he wrote? People come to see themselves as meshed in normal ways of thinking and behaving through socialisation processes in the family, schools, workplace or public space. In turn, they can contrast themselves with the aberrant or abnormal people who lack self-control or self-denial and therefore behave badly. P. 321, 2009. This is very interesting as he is thinking the same as Monderman in the use of people and their control.Conclusion. Both Buchannan and Monderman were modern day thinkers of engineering and planning road traffic, both had relative achievement in their tasks and both used people and segregation from cars. Monderman with Buchannan without Both ideas are very interesting, although I think Buchannans is out-dated by now but he played a major role in linked Kingdoms traffic engineering. Hans Mondermans idea is really fascinating though and I wonder greatly if it is working and how many other nations will take up this idea. References. Silva.Elizabeth, 2009 Making social lives. United Kingdom the centripetal University. Milton Keynes. Silva. Elizabeth, 2009 making social order, 7 31 pp. 326-328,United Kingdom the impart University. Milton Keynes Silva, Elizabeth, 2009 Making social order, Silva cited Buchanan p. 326 7, United Kingdom the Open University. Milton Keynes Silva, Elizabeth, 2009 making social order 7 Silva cited Koop Kerkestra-Monderman p. 334 Making social order. United kingdom the Open University Milton Keynes. The Open University cited Foucault, 2009 pp-319-322. 7, 2. 2. he social sciences and social order. United Kingdom, the Open University Milton Keynes. Self-reflection, although I have a fair way to go yet I am starting to grasp the basics of social science and how they work and order things, this assignment was my most focused yet and although it is frustrating not being able to find other sources for my work especially on the results of how Monderman and Buchannans theories have worked out since they started I think my work could be even better in the future. Word count 1696 including references and self-reflection.